Sixty-one College Presidents Withdraw from the College Rankings
System - Yale to Host Conference on Developing Alternative Ways
to Compare Colleges
PORTLAND,
Aug. 9 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/
The Education Conservancy (EC) has garnered 61 signatures to a
letter committing college presidents to disengage from U.S. News
and World Report's rankings, EC Executive Director Lloyd Thacker
announced today. The letter is part of a campaign to reform
college admissions and represents an unprecedented renouncement
by college presidents of the current rankings system.
Signatories of the letter agree not to complete the U.S. News
reputational survey and not to mention their institutions'
rankings in their promotional literature. In addition, the
letter asks presidents to participate in efforts to find viable
alternatives to current rankings practices.
http://www.educationconservancy.org/presidents_letter.html
In a related development, the Yale University Office of
Undergraduate Admissions has agreed to host a conference
sponsored by the Education Conservancy, and including experts
from education, business and technical fields. The conference,
"Beyond Ranking: Responding to the Call for Useful Information,"
will take place on the Yale campus on September 25, 2007. It
will focus on developing a robust and easily accessible system
of
information that families, students and counselors may use to
obtain and
compare educationally relevant information about colleges.
"Ranking distorts the ways in which education is perceived and
pursued," said Lloyd Thacker, founder and director of the EC.
"It implies a
false precision and authority that is simply not supported by
data or by
the educational sensibilities of many students, parents and
educators. By working together, college presidents now have an
opportunity to develop a
more legitimate system of information and guidance."
Yale's Dean of Undergraduate Admissions, Jeff Brenzel, said, "We
know that ranking systems produced by commercial publications
can be misleading
or irrelevant to the college search process. So we are
supporting efforts
that the Education Conservancy is making to determine whether
there are
feasible alternatives. The important thing to understand is that
educators
truly want students, parents and counselors to have more and
better ways to
compare colleges and universities than they have now."
About The Education Conservancy
The Education Conservancy is a nonprofit organization that works
with
leaders in higher education to make the college admission system
more
appropriate for students, families, schools and colleges. For
more
information, visit the Education Conservancy at
http://www.educationconservancy.org
College Selectivity, Name-Brand Colleges
and the Quality of Education
Revised from an article by Barbara Pasalis
Originally printed in
The Sun Newspapers
April 22, 2004
At this time of year, families of college-bound high school
seniors race to the news stand to pick up the latest edition of
the U. S. News College Rankings.
We all know the names of the colleges at the top of the list –
Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford… – all undoubtedly fine
institutions. These are the institutions with the lowest
acceptance rate.
But these represent fewer than 100 of the 2,400 four-year
colleges and universities.
What do the most selective institutions offer that the other
2,400 don’t? The
Ivy League was started, after all, as an athletic conference.
Because they turn away applicants in greater numbers than
other colleges, they have risen to the top of the college
rankings. One
college actually increased its selectivity ranking by
eliminating all educational requirements, thereby encouraging
free-thinking students to apply.
They realized that the more students that applied for
admission, the more they could deny.
And thus, they moved up the ladder.
The point is, that a college’s rank is not a gauge of its
educational quality.
The Ivies should not take all the credit for the success
of their graduates – their students were the country’s best and
the brightest before they arrived at their doorstep.
More meaningful is the success of smaller colleges, without
selective admissions policies.
In spite of accepting over 75% of their applicants, many
of these lesser-known institutions turn out PhD’s, scientists,
physicians, attorneys, diplomats and business leaders out of all
proportion to their selectivity.
At these institutions, you’ll find faculty that have fled the
research treadmill of larger universities to dedicate themselves
to teaching undergraduates.
Instead of lecture halls of 400 students, the largest
classes seat 50 students, the smallest seat 4 or 5, and
sometimes 1! If you
check their success rate, you’ll find that their record of
admission to medical and law school rivals and sometimes
surpasses even the Ivies’.
Additionally, because of the smaller numbers, it is easier for
students to find their personal niche and become leaders,
contributing to their campus community and the community at
large, and building self-confidence along the way.
You can learn more about these hidden gems from Loren Pope in
his books Looking Beyond the Ivy League and Colleges
That Change Lives.
Baseball:
An
Allegory for the College Admissions Process?
Revised from an article
by Barbara Pasalis
Originally printed in
The Sun Newspapers
July 8, 2004
Over the 4th of July weekend my family attended a
game of the minor league Lake County Captains.
This was our second trip to a minor league baseball game.
We usually attend Indians games, of course!
Isn’t it always better in the big leagues?
As we exited Route 2 and approached the park, we found parking
next to the ballpark.
There was no waiting in long lines of traffic or circling
around to find an available parking space.
When we entered the ballpark, we were pleasantly
surprised to find our seats – on the first base side of home
plate about ten rows back!
The smaller, less crowded, more intimate ballpark enabled
us to get an up close and personal view of the action.
The food was essentially the same -- hot dogs, nachos, fries,
pizza, ice cream, snow cones, and souvenir cups.
The Cargo Store offered caps, t-shirts, baseballs and
bobblehead dolls for sale, just like an Indians Team Shop.
Rocco Scotti sang the National Anthem.
The game was identical to the game played at Jacobs Field – but
it was friendlier!
There were contests between innings where children could run the
bases, racing against the Captain’s mascot and winning prizes.
Adults competed at throwing a baseball through a target and
hitting a baseball over the home run fence.
It was evident that the regular fans had come to know the
emcee, who directed these on-field contests.
People knew each other, and there was a pervasive sense
of camaraderie. It
wasn’t long before we, too, came to know the players – those who
would get the hits as well as those who would strike out.
As I sat and enjoyed the action, I realized that going to a
minor league game is a little like choosing a smaller,
lesser-known college over a state university or prestigious Ivy
League institution.
Certainly the facilities are smaller; there are fewer people; it
might even be less glamorous.
But are these necessarily bad things?
There is also less bureaucracy and less red tape.
Where does misperception end and reality begin?
The up close and personal atmosphere at the minor league game is
analogous to the atmosphere on a small, college campus.
People smile and greet each other as they walk across
campus, rather than rushing in a harried fashion.
Students are not closed out of classes, and consequently,
they are more likely to finish in four years.
Professors take time for their students, discussing
issues both inside and outside of the classroom; they help
students find internships and apply to graduate schools; they
aren’t too busy and pressured trying to get published before
their next evaluation.
In fact, these professors are measured by the quality of
their teaching, rather than the volume of their research.
As more and more students apply to colleges every year and the
college admissions process becomes increasingly competitive,
parents and students ask themselves these questions.
The college admissions process has changed dramatically
over the past decade as the children of baby boomers reach
college age and flood admissions offices with applications.
Another factor that has had a dramatic impact on
admissions is globalization.
Today we think in global, not national, terms.
Previously, colleges sought to increase diversity on
their campuses by admitting minority students.
Today, that’s not enough.
Universities seek diversity in terms of ethnic
background, national origin, geographic region, gender, academic
specialty, extracurricular interests, etc.
Does this mean that a student must excel in everything in order
to be an attractive candidate for admission?
No! Colleges
are not looking for a jack-of-all-trades.
Students should refrain from joining every
extracurricular club simply to pad their resume.
Colleges build their well-rounded classes by combining
the talents of well-lopsided students.
These are the students who have a special skill,
interest, talent, passion, area of knowledge, or something that
will make them a unique contributor to the class.
A class of students will be built so that the strengths
or special interests of each individual balances out the talents
of the others.
What does this mean for students seeking admission to college?
Above all, students must be true to themselves.
They should take the classes they love and in which they
excel. They should
participate in activities that interest them and which fit their
personalities. Their high school record should be a reflection
of who they are and the things that they love.
It is impossible to predict whether University X will be
looking for a quarterback from Iowa,
a violinist from Illinois, or a
French major from
Hawaii
next year. What can
be predicted is that students who immerse themselves in the
things they love and in which they excel during their high
school years will be able to articulate their special talents,
or “passion.”
They are more interesting applicants.
This is the “what else” of college admissions.
It is not enough to be the class valedictorian.
Deans of Admission ask, “What else do you have to
offer?” The student that has that special talent is the one who
will be most attractive for admission.
So, relax. Take the
most rigorous curriculum in which you can excel.
Focus on the academic disciplines you love.
Participate in your favorite activities and become a
leader. Don’t
do everything – do a few things really well.
Be yourself.
Colleges will recognize who you are and appreciate you for your
special talents.
While we can’t predict what type of candidate a particular
college will be seeking for its class next year, we do know that
the college that needs and desires your special talents will
want you. This is
your college match, the college where you will fit in,
contribute to the campus and be happy and successful.
This is the college that’s perfect for you.
A Cruel Time for College Applicants

By Webster T. Trenchard | August 23, 2007
ON THE surface, the college admissions process seems like a
meritocracy. Students are evaluated on a set of objective
components (i.e. grades and test scores) that are interspersed
with some subjective ones (i.e. essays, interviews, and letters
of recommendation). Those who make the cut are accepted; those
who do not are rejected; those who fall somewhere in between are
offered the purgatory-like status of wait-list. There is no way
to predict, with certainty, how a given applicant will fare at a
particular college in a given year.
Any visit to a college admissions office in August bears this
out. You can often hear admissions officers sounding bubbly in
their declarations: "We are looking for much more than just
strong test takers." "There are many factors that go into a
decision." "We have no cut-offs." And my least favorite: "You'll
never know unless you apply."
Standing in stark relief to those cheerful assurances are the
rather glum reports, punctuated as they are by sighs and
explanations of unforeseen increases in applications, that I
receive in March during phone conversations with representatives
from admissions offices. Rarely do colleges seem as optimistic
or encouraging then. A student who asked in the summer about her
SAT scores that put her clearly in the bottom half of accepted
students was assured, "Those are just a range of scores." In
March, that student's "scores were just not competitive in the
pool."
Another family, concerned about the fact that their son earned a
few C's as a freshman on his way toward becoming a steady B+
student, asked in the summer if the college considered trends in
grades. In the summer, they were assured, "Yes, absolutely, a
student's progress is very important to us." In March the
refrain was a bit different: "He just didn't have the GPA to be
competitive in our pool." And so on.
That leaves me trying to reconcile the encouraging whinnies and
neighs straight from the college admissions horse's mouth with
the more sobering noises from that same beast a mere seven
months later. I didn't take my job because I like to stomp on
the hopes of youngsters, and yet that is often the way in which
my messages are interpreted.
My colleagues in college admissions have it tough, too, as
marketing has become the cornerstone of selective college
admissions. Many on the college side find themselves more
occupied with the statistics that define their applicant pool
and their admitted class than with the individuals who make up
those numbers. Paradoxically, this golden age of selective
college admissions seems to have created more rather than less
pressure upon deans and vice presidents of enrollment
management. (Of course, some would argue that the advent of the
term "enrollment manager" signified the beginning of the end.)
When the applicant pool shrinks, when incoming classes are
small, when an institution sinks in national rankings --
rankings that happen to come out in August -- college presidents
are mortified. Even one year of such disappointing results might
put an enrollment manager on the hot seat. Feeling the pressure,
they turn to their staffs, those very same admissions
representatives who conduct the summer informational sessions,
and remind them that they are in the business of encouraging
prospective applicants to apply. And the cycle continues.
Straight from a summer info session where they picked up on the
heartening signs to go ahead and have Johnny send in the 50
bucks to apply, parents seek me out to ascertain why I am less
confident in their child's chances than they are, why I don't
believe in their prodigy. I try to convince them that I do
believe in their child. But it is a struggle finding the right
words, to bridge the gap between what is advertised as the truth
and what I know to be reality.
Webster T. Trenchard
is director of college guidance at the Loomis Chaffee
School in Windsor, Conn.

SAT Scores Decline for Second Straight Year, as Experts Debate
Cause
By ERIC HOOVER
The
Chronicle of Higher Education
August 29, 2007
The College Board announced on Tuesday that the average combined
scores on the SAT's mathematics and critical-reading sections
for the high-school Class of 2007 declined to the lowest point
in nearly a decade. Officials at the College Board, which owns
the examination, attributed those changes to a larger and
increasingly diverse group of test takers.
Average scores on the math section fell three points, to 515,
and reading scores fell one point, to 502, out of a possible 800
points. Scores on the SAT's controversial new writing section
fell three points, to 494.
Last year the average combined scores on the math and
critical-reading sections dipped by seven points, the biggest
one-year drop since 1975 (The
Chronicle, August 30, 2006). That news raised concerns
among some admissions deans who worried that the recently
revamped test did not correlate with the previous version. Some
questioned whether the lengthened test -- now at three hours and
45 minutes -- had hindered students' performance. But the
College Board attributed that decline, at least in part, to a
fall in the number of students who had taken the exam more than
once (students who retake the SAT generally improve their
scores).
Gaston Caperton, the College Board's president, said this year's
decline stemmed from the expansion of the SAT testing pool in
2007. Of a record 1.5-million test takers in the Class of 2007,
39 percent were members of minority groups, making it the most
diverse group ever. On average, white students score higher on
the exam than black and Hispanic students do. Twenty-four
percent of this year's test takers did not speak English
exclusively as their first language, up from 17 percent a decade
ago. Thirty-five percent were students who would be the first in
their families to attend college.
Some testing experts predicted that this year's SAT results
foreshadowed future declines, as test takers become more
heterogeneous. "This is a good thing," said Seppy Basili, a
senior vice president at Kaplan Inc., a test-preparation
company. "Almost every time you expand the pool, you see a drop
in scores."
ACT Inc., which offers a competing college-entrance test,
announced recently that the national average score on its exam
rose slightly this year, even as the number of test takers
increased by 7 percent from the previous year. The number of SAT
takers increased by about 2 percent.
Robert A. Schaeffer, public-education director for the National Center
for Fair & Open Testing, said the College Board had failed to
offer a sufficient explanation for the score declines, which
reversed a long-term trend of annual increases. Mr. Schaeffer
questioned whether fatigue among test takers was partly
responsible for the lower scores, and whether the new SAT was,
in fact, consistent with the old version, as the College Board
has insisted that it is.
Also on Tuesday, the College Board announced preliminary results
of a forthcoming survey on the effect of the new SAT writing
section, which includes a timed essay. According to the survey,
61 percent of high-school teachers and administrators said the
addition of the writing section had helped increase the emphasis
on writing instruction in classrooms.
More information about this year's scores and test takers is
available on the College Board's
Web site.
Companies Agree to Pay to Settle SAT Error Suit
By
KAREN W. ARENSON


Published: August 25, 2007
Two big testing organizations, the
College Board and NCS Pearson Inc., said yesterday
that they had agreed to pay $2.85 million to settle a
class-action lawsuit involving more than 4,000 students whose
SAT exams were incorrectly scored in 2005.
Under the proposed settlement, the students would receive $275
each or possibly more, if they can show they had suffered
greater damages. The board said last year that for 4,411
students, the reported scores were too low — in a few instances
by as many as 450 points out of a possible 2,400. A retired
judge will decide the final payments.
Edna Johnson, a spokeswoman for the College Board, said
yesterday that the board had agreed to the settlement because
“we’re eager to put this behind us and focus on the future.”
“We deeply regret the inconvenience and the worry that this
caused affected students and parents,” Ms. Johnson said, adding
that the College Board had since “put in place even more quality
control measures.”
Amanda M. Hellerman, of Yorktown Heights, N.Y., who said she
initially received a score that was more than 300 points below
what it should have been, said, “It is great to hear that the
College Board is being held accountable.”
Ms. Hellerman, who now attends
Amherst
College, added, “But what
would be more promising to me is they gave some indication of
how they were going to insure that this kind of thing does not
happen again.”
The College Board disclosed in March 2006 in the midst of the
college admission season that about 1 percent of the nearly
500,000 students who took the SAT exam in October 2005 had
received incorrect scores because their answer sheets had become
moist, causing them to be misread when scanned for scoring.
NCS Pearson, one of the country’s biggest testing companies, had
a contract with the College Board to handle the scoring.
While the board sent revised scores to colleges, some students
said that the lower scores had affected where they applied and
that it was too late to make changes. The board discovered the
problems after a couple of students paid to have their tests
rescored by hand.
The size of the minimum settlement is not that different from
what some students pay for taking the SAT multiple times and for
additional services like rushing their score reports, sending
them to additional colleges, changing their testing centers or
verifying that an exam had been scored correctly. Sitting for
the basic SAT test costs $43. The charge for having the results
of the test double-checked is $50.
Robert A. Schaeffer, public education director for FairTest, a
group that is critical of much standardized testing, called the
settlement “an important reminder that standardized tests are
fallible and that reported scores can be wrong.”
State Senator Kenneth P. LaValle,
a Republican from Port Jefferson, N.Y., who is
chairman of the Senate’s higher education committee and who held
hearings on the scoring problems, also welcomed the agreement.
“Vindication is always a nice thing,” Mr. LaValle said, adding
that he still felt the need for greater oversight. “The testing
institutions need to be accountable.”
T. Joseph Snodgrass, one of the lawyers in Minnesota who
represented the test takers, said that if the settlement
received final approval from a federal district judge in late
November as expected, he believed that payments could go out
early next year.
'Private' Online Photos Really Aren't
by Wayne Parry

Thursday, July 12, 2007
ATLANTIC CITY,
N.J. -- It's not just Jersey
girls who get tripped up by embarrassing Internet photos.
Whether trying to become the next American Idol, Miss America,
or just get an office job somewhere, people are starting to take
steps to ensure that photos and personal information they post
on the Web doesn't end up coming back to bite them.
The latest high-profile victim is Amy Polumbo, who was named
Miss New Jersey last month, only to be hit with an alleged
blackmail attempt by someone hoping to make her resign by
threatening to release embarrassing photos of her.
The pageant board decided Thursday that the photos _ which were
in poor taste, but none featured any nudity _ did not warrant
stripping Polumbo of her crown.
"This was meant to be private," the 22-year-old told NBC's
"Today" show on Thursday. "It was supposed to be between my
friends and I."
But there's no such thing when it comes to photos posted online
or e-mailed to others. Fellow Jersey
girl Antonella Barba became worldwide news earlier this year
when racy photos of the "American Idol" contestant surfaced
during the competition.
"I used to say 'Cover your tracks,' but it really should be,
'Don't make tracks that need to be covered,'" Barba said
Thursday. "Once anything is online, it's free rein.
"I feel so bad for her," said Barba, who has returned to college
in Washington, D.C.
to make up classes she missed while on the TV show. "I've been
in the same situation she's been in. It disgusts me, people's
interest in the dirt and trying to bring somebody down."
Polumbo's mother, Jen Wagner, said her daughter was just like
millions of other young people who thought that just because
their Facebook or MySpace page was set to "private," their
photos would remain that way.
"They don't realize how many people can eventually see these
photos," she said.
The photos of Polumbo came from her Facebook page, which has
since been taken offline.
Embarrassment isn't the only consequence of personal photos
surfacing. Many employers troll social networking sites like My
Space, Facebook and others when checking out a job applicant or
keeping tabs on employees.
Steven Jungman, director of recruiting for Houston-based
ChaseSource LP, told of a young woman his firm helped land a job
with a company working on a sensitive project.
"This was a project that had to be kept secret, that if the
competition found out about it or the media wrote about it
before it was rolled out, it would be very bad for business," he
said. "It even had a secret nickname.
"Every day, twice a day, the company did a ... search for that
title, just to make sure nothing was getting out about it,"
Jungman said. "One morning, an interesting link came up, to
someone's My Space page. It went, 'My name is so-and so, I'm
working on such-and-such for so-and-so.' And right next to that
were photos that would make Anna Nicole Smith blush, and Paris
Hilton go, 'Whoa!'"
Two days later, the woman was fired.
Other tales abound of job applicants getting passed over because
their online pages showed them smoking marijuana, passed out
after drinking, or flashing too much skin.
Theresa O'Neill, a career counselor at Rutgers
University-Newark, urges students to take down their online
photos while looking for a job.
"Think of it as being in a very large, public place like Yankee
Stadium, taking the microphone and broadcasting your personal
information to 50,000 people there," she said. "If you don't
want everyone in the stadium to know the details of your
personal life, then keep them to yourself."
At least some people are listening. A survey last year by the
Web site CollegeGrad.com found that 47 percent of recent
graduates had changed or planned to change their Web pages
because they were looking for a job.
Barba survived on "American Idol" for a time after the photos of
her began circulating, before being voted off by viewers.
She has steadfastly declined to speculate on how the photos of
her became public and says she's not planning any legal action.
"I don't have the time and energy to go after someone the way
they went after me," she said. "We just want to prevent this
from happening to someone else."
More Are Taking a Rain Check on College
By Ian Shapira

Sunday, August 5, 2007
Billy Neville was flipping through the humongous Fiske Guide to
Colleges last fall, yet another senior at a pressure-cooker high
school in search of a game plan, when his mother told him
something unexpected.
"She said, 'Keep in mind, you don't really have to go to
college next year. You can do something fun,' " recalled
Neville, 18, who graduated in June from
Walt Whitman High School in
Bethesda. "I genuinely liked that idea, but I didn't
know how serious she was and how well a year off would work. But
I started looking at the idea, and it looked better than going
to college because I didn't know what I wanted to do at
college."
Ultimately, Neville was accepted at Miami University of Ohio.
But he deferred enrollment for a year, joining the ranks of
maverick students who take a "gap year" -- time off between high
school and college. Some do it to find enlightenment and
introspection, others to learn something new or pursue a
passion.
There are no hard counts of gap-year students, but the National
Association for College Admission Counseling in
Alexandria reports anecdotal evidence from counselors
that more high school graduates these days are seeking a year
off. Gap-year consultants who charge $1,000 or more to advise
students on how to fill the time have emerged.
Some students say they take a gap year to escape stress
accumulated from Advanced Placement courses and competition over
grades and class rank.
"I grew really tired of everything in school. I just didn't like
the atmosphere, especially at Whitman, where if you're not an
overachiever, then you're just . . . I don't know," Neville
said. "So, I was hoping, in my year off, I'll find out what
really interests me."
Neville asked for his deferral in a letter to the admissions
office. "And they came right back, saying, 'Sure,' " said his
mother, Clare Neville.
Ann Larson, a senior associate director of admissions at
Miami of
Ohio, said the university grants deferrals for
medical issues, military service, study abroad and other reasons
on a case-by-case basis.
"We really have no problem with students taking gap years,"
Larson said. "It's very positive what they bring back to the
university. It's a maturing experience."
College admissions officers said they want gap-year students to
improve upon an area of expertise or perform some kind of public
service. John Blackburn, dean of admissions at
University of Virginia, said students often seek
deferrals for missionary work or public service jobs through
such nonprofit organizations as Operation Smile, which performs
free reconstructive surgery on children born with facial
deformities in developing countries. Admissions officials at
Georgetown University estimated that 25 to 30
students admitted each year in a class of almost 1,600 ask for a
deferral, requesting trips abroad to learn a foreign language,
intern at a foreign embassy, or even work at a foreign or
domestic magazine.
Charles Deacon,
Georgetown's admissions director, said: "Students
have to have a plan that we approve of. Mostly it's for some
type of cultural enhancement."
Some outsiders might consider a gap year an exercise in slacking
off. But many students plan their time intensively. Some turn to
consultants, such as the Center for Interim Programs in
Princeton,
N.J., or Taking Off in
Boston.
Consultants typically charge nothing for the first conversation.
But students who want to meet for a lengthy period and discuss
options tailored to their interests might pay $1,000 for
short-term help or $2,000 for longer-term guidance.
Consultants say they keep up with dozens of programs, so they
know which ones are safe and reliable. They also say they know
how to draw out students who might be unsure of their goals.
"I ask them, 'How do you want to live? Do you want to live on
your own or with other kids? Do you want to learn another
language? What's your budget?" said Gail Reardon, founder of
Taking Off. "I have over 3,000 opportunities available."
Neville, planning his gap year on his own, checked out
http://www.studyabroad.com
and considered some volunteer opportunities. He had a yen to
travel with a friend in
Europe and possibly find work. He thought about a job
in
Austria as an English-speaking sports commentator,
but he passed. Recently, he returned from a week of building
homes in Chiapas,
Mexico. He hopes to teach skiing or find other work
in the mountains of
Colorado. He also aims to volunteer with
Habitat for Humanity to help rebuild
New Orleans.
"I want to find out what I can accomplish without my parents or
my school telling me what I can do," Neville said.
Zach Duffy, 17, who just graduated from the Ethical Culture
Fieldston School in
New York City, will spend part of his gap year
traveling in
India in the fall with Global Learning Across
Borders, based in
New York, to cultivate interests in Buddhism,
Hinduism and the environment. He deferred enrollment at
Whitman College in
Washington
state.
"The only trip I've taken abroad is to
Italy, and I stayed at a nice hotel in
Rome and
Florence," Duffy said. "I have a desire
to learn more about the world because I think I'll be able to
conduct myself better in all aspects of my life. If I see
poverty in
India, then I'll be more
humble. I'll just be a more interesting person."
But choosing to take a gap year and forming a plan was not easy.
It also was tricky to determine whether the plan would be
financially feasible. The Duffys wanted to know whether
Brown University in
Rhode Island -- where Zach's older brother is a
rising junior-- would give the family more financial aid even if
Zach were not attending college. (Universities often give extra
help if families have two or more children in college.)
Why are the Duffys so concerned about aid from Brown in the next
school year? Zach's gap year will cost more than $10,000,
including fees, immunizations and equipment.
"We're hoping that they will treat Zach's gap year as if it were
a college experience, but we don't have a commitment from Brown
yet," said Mark Duffy, Zach's father. Even if Brown turns down
their request, Mark Duffy said the gap year will go forward.
Zach has a plane ticket for India on Sept. 16, and he's set up a
"gap year blog" at
http://www.itsthenighttime.blogspot.com.
Early Planning Is the Key to Admission to the College of Your
Choice